Nearly 13 percent of Americans age 20 and older have diabetes, but only 40 percent of that population has been diagnosed, according to a study from epidemiologists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The study’s findings, which can be found at http://diabetes.org/diabetescare, goes on to say that diabetes strikes a large segment of the elderly with nearly one third of those age 65 and older have diabetes. Also, an additional 30 percent of U.S. adults have pre-diabetes, which is marked with high blood sugar that is not yet diabetic.
To conduct the study, researchers compared the results of two national surveys that included a fasting blood glucose (FBG) test and two-hour glucose reading from an OGTT. The OGTT gives more information about blood glucose abnormalities than the FBG test, which measures blood glucose after an overnight fast. A statement from the NIH says the FBG test is easier and less costly than the OGTT, but the two-hour test is more sensitive in identifying diabetes and pre-diabetes, especially in older people. Two-hour glucose readings that are high but not yet diabetic indicate a greater risk of cardiovascular disease and of developing diabetes than a high, but not yet diabetic, fasting glucose level.
“We’re facing a diabetes epidemic that shows no signs of abating, judging from the number of individuals with pre-diabetes,” said the study’s lead author Catherine Cowie, Ph.D., of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), a part of the NIH. “For years, diabetes prevalence estimates have been based mainly on data that included a fasting glucose test but not an OGTT. The 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, or NHANES, is the first national survey in 15 years to include the OGTT. The addition of the OGTT gives us greater confidence that we’re seeing the true burden of diabetes and pre-diabetes in a representative sample of the U.S. population.”
The team also found that:
* The rate of diagnosed diabetes increased between the surveys, but the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes remained relatively stable.
* Minority groups continue to bear a disproportionate burden. The prevalence of diabetes, both diagnosed and undiagnosed, in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican- Americans is about 70 to 80 percent higher than that of non-Hispanic whites.
* Diabetes prevalence was virtually the same in men and women, as was the proportion of undiagnosed cases.
* Pre-diabetes is more common in men than in women (36 percent compared to 23 percent).
* Diabetes is rare in youth ages 12 to 19 years, but about 16 percent have pre-diabetes.
“These findings have grave implications for our health care system, which is already struggling to provide care for millions of diabetes patients, many of whom belong to vulnerable groups, such as the elderly or minorities,” said Griffin P. Rodgers, M.D., director of the NIDDK. “Of paramount importance is the need to curb the obesity epidemic, which is the main factor driving the rise in type 2 diabetes.”
The study is based on 2005-2006 data from the NHANES conducted by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. The survey involved 7,267 people, who represented a national sample of persons age 12 years and older. Participants were interviewed in their homes and received a physical exam. A subsample had a blood sugar reading taken after an overnight fast as well as the OGTT, sometimes called a 2-hour glucose challenge. The OGTT measures blood glucose 2 hours after a person drinks a premeasured sugary beverage. The findings were then compared to those of the last NHANES survey that included the OGTT, which was conducted from 1988 to 1994.
“These findings of yet another increase in diabetes prevalence are a reminder that a full-scale public health response is in order. Re-directing the trends in diabetes will require changing the nutritional and physical activity habits of people at risk, and also creative and substantial efforts by health systems and communities,” said Ed Gregg, Ph.D., epidemiology and statistics branch chief in CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation.