34% of Round One Suppliers Suffer Shaky Credit

Study by Invacare calls into question CMS financial standards for bid winners.

Thirty-four percent suppliers chosen by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to sell to Medicare beneficiaries under a new bidding program have some sort of questionable credit issue, according to a study contracted by DME manufacturer Invacare Corp.

CMS announced on Nov. 2 the names of the 356 bid winners that were offered contracts in the nine competitive bid areas covered by the Round One re-bid. Following that, Invacare conducted it study.

Since many providers finance their purchases of DME with manufacturers, and because Invacare is the largest manufacturer in the industry and maintains its own captive financing company, Invacare Credit Corp., Invacare was able to review the credit and financial data available for the Round One contract holders.

“... This means that over one third of the firms that are authorized to provide Medicare beneficiaries home oxygen therapy, power wheelchairs, enteral nutrition, home care beds, CPAPs and RADs (respiratory devices), walkers and mail order diabetic supplies are in a precarious financial situation and are unlikely to be able to provide the medically necessary items and services over the three-year contract period,” read a public statement from Invacare.

The statistics uncovered by the Invacare study are startling:

  • 8.5 percent have credit limits of less than $10,000, which means they can purchase very little equipment.
  • 5.4 percent are on credit hold, which means they can’t purchase any equipment.
  • 6.7 percent are so far behind on their payments that their accounts have been turned over for collections or legal process, which also means they can’t purchase any equipment.
  • 14 percent have no account with the company, which could indicate they are new and inexperienced companies.

These findings draw into question the Nov. 2 claims made by Jonathan Blum, deputy administrator and director of CMS that all of the contracted suppliers “… meet quality and financial standards and they are all accredited by an independent organization.”

About the Author

David Kopf is the Editor of HME Business.

Research

Comments

Fri, Dec 3, 2010 Ralph Kelley Ironton, OH 45638

I need more information. I feel like something bad is happening and not informed enough to fight or prevent the disaster. Do you have a suggestion of where to start to get up to date? Your response will be greatly appreciated. 9XMH

Fri, Dec 3, 2010 Spider

Hey anti-bid hopefuls. Get ready because competitive bidding is going down like a fish bone caught in the throat. Once a believer in common sense and halting this debacle but I am no more. Everyone's attempts to stop CB is greatly appreciated. There is just no sentiment for us small DME types in this budget cutting environment. Time to eat a big piece of bread and hope we all don't choke.

Fri, Dec 3, 2010

This "study" is based on one manufacturers records and this is the basis of the concern? Using self-serving figures, subjective conclusions and then not comparing the results against their full client list does not provide any credible information. Providing real and effective alternatives is the only longlasting and defensable approach to address competitive bidding.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Webinars & Webcasts

Fast-tracking Retail
Reversing competitive bidding cuts through ramping up your cash sales strategy.

Find out more!

What have you done to advance H.R. 1717, the bill to replace competitive bidding with the MPP?